Monday, 27 April 2026

The New Motoring Hegemony: Why BMW is Winning the Battle for the Consumer Mind


In the traditional halls of economic theory, we are taught that consumers are "rational actors". We assume the buyer walks into a showroom with a mental spreadsheet, weighing kilowatts against rands and boot space against monthly instalments. This mainstream viewthe "efficiency of utility"suggests that BMW’s recent sweep of the 2025 South African Car of the Year with the X3 and the 2026 World Car of the Year with the iX3 is simply the result of a better spec-sheet.

From this perspective, BMW has mastered the "mathematics of luxury". By delivering a 650km range and 400kW charging in the Neue Klasse, they have lowered the "opportunity cost" of going electric. They are simply providing more "refinement units" per rand than the competition.

However, if you look closer, BMW’s dominance isn't just about building a better machine; it’s about a heterodox shift in how we are being taught to drive.

The Architecture of "Path Dependency"

The most profound takeaway from the iX3’s World Car of the Year victory isn't the engineit’s the Panoramic iDrive. In heterodox economics, we speak of "path dependency"the idea that our past choices and learned behaviours dictate our future ones.

By stretching the digital interface from A-pillar to A-pillar, BMW is doing more than providing information; they are establishing a new "visual language". Once a driver internalises this interface, any vehicle with a traditional dashboard feels like a technological regression. BMW isn't just selling a car; they are creating a cognitive "barrier to exit". To switch to a competitor is no longer just a financial change; it’s a difficult process of "un-learning" the future.

The Power of the "Expert Tribe"

We often underestimate the psychological "risk" of a major purchase. Whether it’s the 98 international journalists of the World Car Awards or the SA Guild of Mobility Journalists, these bodies serve as the "tribe of experts".

For the consumer, these awards provide social proof that bypasses individual hesitation. When the X3 wins Car of the Year in South Africa following a 7 Series win the year prior, it creates a "successive victory loop". It signals to the market that there is a "BMW Standard" that is now the safe, dominant and inevitable choice. It moves the brand from being a choice to being the benchmark.

From Horsepower to "Computing Power"

The introduction of the "Heart of Joy"the iX3’s central superbrainmarks the final shift in consumer insight. We are moving away from the era of mechanical engineering into an era of computational utility.

The mainstream consumer used to ask about 0-100km/h times (which, at 4.9 seconds for the iX3, remains impressive). However, the heterodox consumer is now looking for "software-defined luxury". BMW’s focus on "Shy Tech" and 20x higher computing power signals to the market that the "heart" of the car is no longer an engine, but an algorithm.

The Local-Global Synthesis

What makes this moment unique for the South African consumer is the bridge between the "Rosslyn-built" pride of the X3 and the global "quantum leap" of the iX3. There is a powerful emotional narrative here: the same excellence that allows a vehicle to be built in Pretoria to world-class standards is the same spirit driving the World Car of the Year titles.

The Verdict

The lesson for the motoring industry is clear. You do not win the modern consumer by simply being "better" or "cheaper". You win by dominating the evolution of the market.

BMW is no longer just selling "Sheer Driving Pleasure". Through a combination of technical efficiency and psychological standard-setting, they are selling "systemic dominance". They are teaching us that the future has a specific look, a specific feel and a specific digital heartbeat. And according to the awards, the worldand South Africais more than ready to learn.

Picture: Courtesy of BMW Group


Thursday, 19 February 2026

Tlhaloso ya diphetoho tse rerilweng mabapi le sekgahla sa kadimo sa prime (prime lending rate)

Banka e kgolo ea  Afrika Boroa (SARB) e sisinya phetoho e kgolo mabapi le hore na sekgahla sa tswala dikadimong se ngolwe jwang. Banka e batla ho emisa ho sebedisa sekgahla sa kadimo ya Prime (PLR) 'mme ena e nkelwe sebaka ke sekgahla sa leano la SARB / policy rate (SPR), se tsejwang ka tlwaelo e le "sekgahla sa repo (repo rate)."

Mona ke tlhaloso e bonolo ea seo sena se se bolelang ho wena monga’ thepa:

Hobaneng phetoho e le teng?

E siiloe ke nako: Ho latela histori, "Prime" e ne e le sekgahla se tlase ka ho fetisisa seo libanka li se fileng bareki ba tsona ba bohlokwa ka ho fetisisa. Kajeno, ke palo feela e sebelisetswang tsamaiso –  hantle eleng 3.5% (dintlha tse 350 tsa motheo) ka holimo ho sekgahla sa repo.

Ho oa ferekanya: Batho ba bangata ba etsa phoso ka ho lumela hore sekheo sa 3.5% ke phaello e tiisitsweng bakeng sa dibanka, kapa hore "Prime" ke sebaka sa ho qala ho buisana ka kadimo. Ha e le hantle, dibanka di beha sekgahla sa hau sa tswala ho latela ditshenyehelo tsa tsona le boemo ba hau bo ikhethang ba dichelete.

Maemo a lefatshe: Sekgahla sa hona jwale sa Prime ha se fihlelle maemo a machaba a ponaletso le a ts'epo bakeng sa ditekanyetso tsa dichelete. Banka e lakatsa ho tshwana le mafatshe amang ha ho tluoa tabang tsa ponaletso le botshepehi ha ho buua ka ditaba tsa dichelete.

See se tla ama pokotho ea hao jwang?

Tefo ya hao ya 'nete e tla dula e tshwana: Ena ke phetoho ya ho ngola mabitso, eseng phetoho ya ditshenyehelo.

Diphetoho tsa dipalo: Hona joale, kadimo e ka 'na ya qotswa e le "Prime (=10.25%) + 2%." Tlas'a tsamaiso e ncha, kadimo eo e tshwanang e tla qotswa e le "Repo (= 6.75%) + 5.5%." Qetellong sekgahla sa ho qetela sa tswala seo u se lefang se ntse se tlo tshwana.

Ponaletso e ncha: Ho tla hlaka hore na sekgahla sa hao sa tswala se behiloeng ke Banka ea Reserve ke bokae le hore na banka yona e o lefisa bokae bakeng sa kadimo ea hau ea mokoloto / o itseng.

Moralo oa phetoho

Nako: Sena se ke ke sa etsahala ka bosiu bo le bong. Diphetoho di lebelletswe ho qala ka selemo sa 2027 kapele kamoo ho ka kgonehang.

Dikoloto tse seng di le teng: Ho na le dikonteraka tse fetang dimilione tse 12 tse seng di ntse di le teng (jwalo ka mekoloto ya matlo le dikadimo tsa ho lefella dikoloi) tse hokahantsweng le Prime. Ho boloka dintho di le bonolo ebile di lokile, tsena di ka fetolwa ha bonolo ho sebeliswa sekgahla se tsitsitseng sa 3.5% e le hore ho se ke ha e-ba le motho ya lahlehelwang kapa ya fumanang chelete feela ka lebaka la phetoho ena ea lebitso.

Ditshireletso tsa molao: Mmuso o rera ho theha melao ea "kou e sireletsehileng (safe harbour law)" ho netefatsa hore dibanka di ke ke tsa sebedisa phetoho ena ho fetola dikonteraka tsa hao tse seng di ntse di le teng di sebedisa leeme.


Ke e beha mohatla khwiti hona mona.


Thursday, 22 May 2025

SA Budget 3.0: Social Grants

 Social grants have been increased and there is a possibility for the creation of a "jobseeker allowance".

- Old age grant will increase from R2185 to R2315;

- War veterans grant will increase from R2205 to R2335;

- Disability grant will go up from R2185 to R2315;

- Foster care grant rises from R1180 to R1250;

- Care dependency grant will increase from R2185 to R2315;

- Child support grant will go up from R530 to R560;

- The grant-in-aid will increase from R530 to R560;

- SRD grant increase from R350 to R370 (extended until 31 March 2026).

Note: SRD grant might be converted to jobseekers allowance in the future to create employment opportunities.

Tuesday, 12 September 2023

Unrealistic economic theorising meets real world experience - "it's chae"


Got so thrilled today reading two article from of one the main media houses about the localisation and import substitution policy strategy for the South African economy.

First, the two articles appeared on the same day in the same publication - what are the chances!

Secondly, one article reads like the textbook argument of the mainstream economics - the usual stuff:

Restricts investment;

Import substitution that is biased against exports;

Uncompetitive by restricting imports;  

Lack of foreign know-how constraints innovation; 

Violates international trade commitments; and

Encourages rent-seeking behaviour.

Thirdly, the other article makes the case for the localisation and import substitution based on the real experience by a local manufacturing company – very practical:

Sourcing locally makes business sense and is less complicated;

Localisation allows for flexibility (i.e., quick changes and customisations);

Import substitution has the potential to boost innovation, skills (engineering) and the economy.

The articles reminded me of my teaching days – would have been an interesting topic for classroom debate and of course a great examination question!

NB: I don't know what "it's chae" mean - my son says that a lot when he is happy about something!😀



Tuesday, 21 October 2014

The myth about deficits

The minister of finance is said to be in tight spot because the fiscal position of South Africa does not allow any opportunity to spend or borrow. The argument is that both the budget deficit and the level of debt are high. And the suggestion is that the government should cut down on spending.

Now looking at the last point about spending cuts, economics 101 talks about a multiplier working in reverse. So what the economists are saying is that the government should literally choke the South African economy. The consequences of cutting government spending at this juncture are dire - increase the deficit itself, deepen and prolong the slump, create chronic unemployment and slows economic recovery.

The issue of high deficit being a constraint to the economy is myth because it treats government the same way as individual households and companies. That is, living within ones' means to avoid the suffering in the near future. Well governments assets cannot be simply sold to recover any losses as happens with individuals and companies. The government cannot be broken up - it is a sovereign entity and always has an upper hand in debt negotiations.

And lastly, the IMF has encouraged Sub-Saharan African countries to spend more on infrastructure at this point in time simply because they can afford to - debt service costs are their lowest levels!

The whole argument about deficits is nuat = (nothing Ubuntu about that)!

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Welcome to the ubuntu-economics blog!

This blog is for sharing my thoughts, views and believes on the subject of economics. Why ubuntu? Well it is very much an appropriate title given my views about what economics as a study into society's survival should be.

Ubuntu resonates very much with issues of justice, fairness, transparency, honesty, etc. Has anyone asked themselves about the nature of economics being taught at institutions of learning (i.e., starting at secondary school!) and reported in the media - does the subject address the concept of ubuntu as well as aligning itself to the issues of survival? Can the lives of the society be bettered given what is being taught and advocated out there? Is the subject meant to address issues that are "important" to the chosen few? The questions are many - and please share yours!

The blog is aimed at addressing this issues from the perspective of the type of economics that addresses what ubuntu speaks to.

Please join me as I share with you my thoughts and views on ubuntu economics - A BETTER LIFE IS POSSIBLE!!!